CaptainHulk Posted April 7, 2015 Report Share Posted April 7, 2015 I think this is Angel's second major WTF moment for this year, the first being using Shane as bait for Tug in the whole Sarah business. *irritated that this week's eps are... inaccessible to him at present* I remember the story though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old H&A Fan Posted April 7, 2015 Report Share Posted April 7, 2015 I think this is Angel's biggest "WTF" moment of her whole time in Summer Bay, it's hard to think of many more ridiculous things Angel ever did I can't believe Angel fell for his sob story. Shane didn't believe him, I just hope Angel learns a lesson from this and she was lucky Shane came home when he did. Then she lied to Nick about what he looked like. Can't blame Shane for being stroppy with her. Angel is too soft-hearted for her own good! I'm glad Nick got stuck into her too. He's a criminal, he committed a serious crime. He better not get away with it. Two storylines I'm hating atm, the stupid romance between Sarah and Nathan and now Spud. Nathan sure can pull the wool over his mother's eyes. If only Damian will tell her that he was abused by his brother. However I do like her friendship with Ailsa. And Luke sure can be nasty when he wants to be. Manhandling Nathan in front of the students does not set a good example for them. BUT Nathan did deserve it and on the other hand Luke could have handled himself better. I've coloured your comments Natasha according to what I like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beau_t Posted April 7, 2015 Report Share Posted April 7, 2015 I think this is Angel's biggest "WTF" moment of her whole time in Summer Bay, it's hard to think of many more ridiculous things Angel ever did Crossing the road without looking was pretty stupid... But yeah I agree. I've coloured your comments Natasha according to what I like. LOL! How efficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Is anyone else finding it a bit hard to believe that Fisher would actually fall for Nathan's lies? It defies credibility IMO. Also, do Sarah and Nathan actually date? Or is it over before it begins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Ranger 1 Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 I haven't seen last week's either, so I may change my mind when I see it, and I also missed the resolution first time round but from what I remember I was kind of on Angel's side.There but for the grace of God: That could have been her if she'd been left on the streets instead of striking lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natasha Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Is anyone else finding it a bit hard to believe that Fisher would actually fall for Nathan's lies? It defies credibility IMO. Also, do Sarah and Nathan actually date? Or is it over before it begins? Well he's got his mum wrapped around his finger but yes I'm also finding it hard to believe that Fisher would choose a crim over his former student. Does Fisher even know about Nathan's past? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old H&A Fan Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 You'd think that they had criminal record checks on people working in schools, but oh no.......Nathan had to be given "another chance" as Irene keeps harping on about....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Ranger 1 Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 I think Don does know, I remember him joking about how two of the applicants, Nathan and Tug, both had criminal records.It's just we're in the days before CRB checks here, where no-one thought twice about convicted burglars working as school caretakers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old H&A Fan Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Is it just me or has Tug's father magically changed his appearance? (see this tweet) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHulk Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 That's what I thought. First go around and all. Prison's supposed to put YEARS on a man, not the other way round! You can buy Bert King's 1995-97 appearance being different from his 1988 one (Granted, he is a fair bit older than Roy) but this is something else. I'm guessing Papa O'Neill had a good plastic surgeon inside! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.