Ryan Posted November 28, 2005 Report Share Posted November 28, 2005 Nah, if both have got 1.345 Home and Away goes first because H becomes from M. They're wrong Valk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 Nah, if both have got 1.345 Home and Away goes first because H becomes from M. They're wrong Valk. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, that's the rounded figure, but raw figures, McLeod's won. Also, Home and Away's average rating in 2003 was 1.3m, in 2004 1.3m, and in 2005 1.3m. So really, when people go on about how much the show has improved in ratings, well on average it has just stayed the same, whilst other shows have declined. Ratings figures here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Austr...r_Home_and_Away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrychris Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 That's because in the middle of the year after the stalker storyline the show went down for a bit. It's the last few months where the ratings figures have been massive but because for something like this it's averaged over the entire year that would be lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amir Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 That's because in the middle of the year after the stalker storyline the show went down for a bit. It's the last few months where the ratings figures have been massive but because for something like this it's averaged over the entire year that would be lower. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Exactly. Valk i think your facts are wrong!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 That's because in the middle of the year after the stalker storyline the show went down for a bit. It's the last few months where the ratings figures have been massive but because for something like this it's averaged over the entire year that would be lower. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Exactly. Valk i think your facts are wrong!!! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well we are talking about the whole year here in this topic, starrychris. And h&afan, by definition, facts cannot be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmy Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 Wikipedia can sometime be wrong I.e I just changed it Year Average Viewers (5 City Metro, 00000s) 2005 9.99993754638 2004 1.3 2003 1.33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 Wikipedia can sometime be wrong I.e I just changed it Year Average Viewers (5 City Metro, 00000s) 2005 9.99993754638 2004 1.3 2003 1.33 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's people like you who think it's funny to add false information that have made it an unreliable source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmy Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 I don't think it's funny, I was just giving an example, not as though anyone would actually believe that anyway Besides if Wikipedia was to be reliable they wouldn't have it so any random could edit the page EDIT: There, I changed it back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 Woah, 10 million people watch Home and Away, that's like half of Australia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 That's what i was thinking... Can't people change that site? So Valk, i'm not saying your wrong, but there could be a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.