dnp52td Posted June 4, 2007 Report Posted June 4, 2007 She sued a mens magazine for using unauthorized photos of her and now she's gone and done a proper photoshoot with one! hmm.. well i'm not complaining http://www.fhm.com.au/site/content/article.aspx?ID=16724 Ever since her Home And Away alter ego, Tasha Andrews, washed up all salty and damp on the shores of Summer Bay in 2003, we’ve found room in our hearts for Isabel Lucas. Well, less a room, more a monumental shrine made of gold and jewels. Franky, FHM is deeply, deeply in love with Isabel, which is why we high-fived and embraced each other in masculine expressions of joy when the 22-year-old half-Swiss stunner agreed to frolic surfside exclusively for FHMTV!
claire_louise Posted June 5, 2007 Report Posted June 5, 2007 Lol, it does seem a little bit hypocritical, especially considering her less-than-enthusiastic response to being voted in the Sexiest Women poll. It's amazing what people will do to boost their profile.
Guevara01 Posted June 5, 2007 Report Posted June 5, 2007 She did an interview about it where she explained why she would do it. She got complete artistic imput; the photographer, the location, the nature of the shoot, final say on editing the photographs, content etc I don't know if the troubles with "Ralph" earlier were so much about the magazine, or just the fact that they were unsolicited photos being used in the magazine xx
claire_louise Posted June 5, 2007 Report Posted June 5, 2007 Yes, I was going to say that. She seemed more bothered about the fact that they used them without permission. The main reason I was surprised that she'd do a shoot like this was the way she reacted to being in the FHM poll. It just seemed like she wanted to be recognised for her acting, and not objectified as a 'sex symbol'.
Guevara01 Posted June 5, 2007 Report Posted June 5, 2007 I sort of agree. But those were her dad's words though, or her dad was speaking on behalf of her. Maybe it didn't come across the right way. I thought when I read it, based on previous interviews i've seen/read with her, it's more likely she meant "Thanks, but there is more to me than looks". Maybe i'm wrong though xxx
ter06 Posted June 5, 2007 Report Posted June 5, 2007 Looks like Isabel's money is drying up and that's why she did it.
summer bay high Posted June 7, 2007 Report Posted June 7, 2007 i dont think she has done it because money is drying up. i think that she opposed those ralph pictures because she didn't consent for them to be used. i bet she's not against doing those kinda photo shoots as long as she is control hence the shoot with fhm!!
claire_louise Posted June 7, 2007 Report Posted June 7, 2007 I do find it funny that she said she wanted to show that women can still look sexy 'covered up'. She's not exactly wearing a full-length parka is she?!
ilovekateritchie Posted June 8, 2007 Report Posted June 8, 2007 /\ Lol. She looks so... different. I liked her sweet and innoccent blonde look better... but she's still hot.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.