MarMar Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 Yes. No Felix, no Sarah, and no idea what's going on in 2005 and why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 ...Because they skipped the whole 2004 season? They should of done a catch-up-episode thing. Like what Channel Nine did for Days of our Lives... That way everyone can be kind of up to date with what's going on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarMar Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 I can understand why they don't start at 1988, so to speak, but from 2004-2006 (will the rumours of Non!Zoe returning), the seasons have blended really well, and it would be weird to be thrown into 2005 without any idea why stuff is happening. They might do a re-cap thing. I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 True... But then again i can see why they started at 2005 because that season started off with no cliffhangers or nothing... But yeah, they did skip the whole BIG SEASON of 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarMar Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 Yeah.. But 2004 started better, IMO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 I thought so too, they started with a family trapped in a mine and amazingly they all survived ... Does anyone know if H&A is rating well in Sweden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 2005 is a good year to start on because there were no cliffhangers and it started off a bit like a whole new show in some respects. But 2005 is Season 18, not 17. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 Yeah, that's what i was trying to say in my post above^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 Press Release: TV3 New Zealand 19 April, 2006 Home and Away Multi-Year Deal for New Zealand Following the huge success of the international hit series Home and Away in New Zealand, TV3 have signed a further multi-year contract in a deal negotiated by Southern Star International’s Head of Sales, Alison Baker. “We are delighted that our ongoing relationship with Southern Star ensures we can continue to bring our viewers the much loved Home and Away. We are confident the quality of the show will ensure its success for years to come”, says Beverley McGarvey, TV3’s Director of Programming. The award-winning soap has become a viewing phenomenon around the world with an estimated weekly audience of over 50 million. Territories sold include the UK, New Zealand, Italy, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, Norway, Israel, Middle East, South Africa and Africa continent, Asia Pan Pacific, Estonia and Nigeria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liz Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 2005 is a good year to start on because there were no cliffhangers and it started off a bit like a whole new show in some respects. Yeah, I really liked that. The first episode was basically just the teens heading off for a camping trip, which could easily have been the start of a film. It's just a shame that none of the Stalker storyline will make any sense to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.