smoothiehead Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 has anyone got a photo of becs baby? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperFlynn Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 They have an exclusive deal with a magazine so the pics won't be public for a week or so yet, at least not officially. I am sure someone will let one out soon though, if the price is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungle Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 This must be such a horrible way to have a baby. Having to hide away so no-one sees her, rather than being able to go outside, etc and do normal newborn baby things. Greed is such an awful thing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 I don't think they were going to go outside with a few day old baby and parade her around to the media either. That would be worse then keeping her away from the cameras, don't you think? However, they are keeping her away from the media for the wrong reason, to protect a $1.5 million contract they have with Woman's Day Magazine, who would be very annoyed that the name has been leaked out I would presume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveangelmusicbaby Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 I wish I could see a pic of the baby. She will be so cute. I suppose it will prob be in next week's Woman's Day. If not, then prob early next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnp52td Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 has anyone got a photo of becs baby? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You would be one very rich person if you did! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TabbyCool Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 I don't think they were going to go outside with a few day old baby and parade her around to the media either. That would be worse then keeping her away from the cameras, don't you think? However, they are keeping her away from the media for the wrong reason, to protect a $1.5 million contract they have with Woman's Day Magazine, who would be very annoyed that the name has been leaked out I would presume. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Totally agree, it's nothing to do with the kid's welfare or privacy, they just want to protect their cash. It's all very well for people to say, "that must be terrible, not being able to take their baby outside" but when you are a celebrity couple, it's just part of the game. Plenty of celebs manage to keep their children away from the media and allow them to live pretty normal (ok, very priveleged) private lives. Then there are the others like Bec and Lleyton, who would rather make easy money from selling photos of their new born baby to some tacky celebrity magazine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.