Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

j.laur5

Why do you think PTB decided to bring back Colleen in 1999?.

Recommended Posts

On 02/07/2017 at 4:17 AM, adam436 said:

 

I couldn't agree more. She was okay in small doses, but her voice and constant meddling was just too much. I didn't watch H&A much between 2005-2013, so I can't really comment on the Stewart connection. 

 

Does anyone else think Celia or perhaps Floss would have been better as a regular from 1999-2012? Both Sheila and Fiona were much more subtle actors and both characters had stronger connections to the cast of time.

I think Lyn was a subtle and good enough actress, it was more how the writers wrote for Colleen. Lyn said in and interview that she wished TPTB gave Colleen more depth.

When she returned in 1999 she seemed much more hard nosed and her feet were on the ground, but around 2004 onwards they just made her sillier and sillier.

Lyn was terrific in Colleen's breast cancer and long lost daughter storylines.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.