Tamxxx Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 Ok maybe its a bit young, but my grandparents had had sex at 13 and by that time my grandma was married at 15 and my grandad at 18, they never regretted it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 But what was the result of the sex? We dont know if he was "developed" enough to actually get her pregnant. (if he used protection, then no). If he wasn't developed enough to then he is to young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idiotdrugs Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 i refuse to call that piece of crap a 'newspaper'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Tess- Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 But it would be his and the girl's decision, when to have sex. It is theirs, not anyone else's. Whenever they feel ready, they should if they want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmy Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 But he seems so proud of the fact! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loz Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 Is this such a big deal? He's not going around 'boasting' that he did it at age 13, he was asked when he did it and he gave the honest answer. And he doesn' t say 'nookie' is an important part of his life, the paper says it, and backs it up with a direct quote. Besides, sex *is* an important part of life. I don't think the paper would make this story up, mostly because if they're going to make stuff up they'll choose someone who's actually famous in Britain. It sounds like someone at the paper read the Soap Life interview and picked up on the part of it they wanted to emphasise. Shoddy 'journalism', but no biggie really. He doesn't sound 'proud' of the fact - the paper says he is - but I don't think he should be ashamed. I don't think he's under any obligation to be a role model. But if he is one, I'd sooner he was a role model who told the truth than one who lied to make himself seem squeaky clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emmadolly Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Good on him for telling the truth, if that was the truth, as you can not beleive what youn read these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeandaway_lover~~! Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 thats gross! but it is the daily star.. i mean c'mon they tell enough lies as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete4Leah Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 He's just a tosser and unfortuantly we're (including me) are doing exactly what he would've wanted.....giving him attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric_luvs_Cassie Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 I kinda doubt it... it's like... gross... ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.